My lecture explores a phenomenon in transference wherein two opposing forces in the patient’s psyche operate simultaneously. On the one hand, the analysand is attached to the psychoanalyst, expressing a longing for connection as a derivative of the life drive. On the other hand, simultaneously, the analysand maintains a defensive internal position of mental stagnation, in which internal clinging to and “magnetization” of internal objects and part objects prevail. I argue that this clinging stems from the recognition of separateness between subject and object, which arouses persecutory anxieties. Therefore, clinging is intended to protect the psyche from an object that is perceived as threatening. This clinging is expressed in two ways: (1) clinging to an external object, represented by the psychoanalysis and the psychoanalyst, which sometimes does not allow space for a separate existence; (2) clinging of internal objects to each other, thus preventing and violently repelling any of the analyst’s attempts to “enter” the analysand’s mind. 

I wish to demonstrate how the concept of projective identification helps in understanding these primitive mental processes, while arguing that the concept of adhesive identification should be reserved for more pathological states of mind. In addition, I emphasize that the desperate clinging to the internal and external object is a defense whose intensity can decrease through a relationship with a patient and benevolent object. 

I will present clinical material from both children and an adult to open the discussion about the challenging position that is required from the analyst, when trying to establish a therapeutic relationship with patients who are characterized by magnetized internal objects.